What does it really mean to lead?
In short: aligning people and moving them together toward a shared outcome. But leadership is more than inspiring, coordinating, and activating others.
A good leader not only sets goals—they help their team reach them by making the most of everyone’s talents. Great leaders aren’t blind to their own or others’ weaknesses—they just know their competitive edge lies in their strengths.
We’ve long tried to categorise leaders by opposites:
Democratic vs. Autocratic
Participative (involving others) vs. Directive (deciding alone)
Positional (authority from title) vs. Personal (authority from character and skill)
But decades of research show that the best leaders don’t excel equally in all areas. Instead, they leverage their strengths—and surround themselves with people whose skills complement their gaps.
What is strengths-based leadership?
In their 2009 book Strengths-Based Leadership, Tom Rath and Barry Conchie analysed fifty years of Gallup research, twenty thousand interviews with senior leaders and their teams, and data from over a million teams worldwide.
They found a common trap: even the best leaders spend too much time trying to “fix” their weaknesses—while neglecting what they already do well.
A bakery lesson in strengths
Imagine Adam, a culinary school student who dreams of opening a restaurant. There’s one problem: he’s a terrible cook. But when it comes to baking, he’s unmatched—and he has a natural talent for leading people.
Well-meaning friends and mentors urge him to focus on cooking, to improve where he’s weak. Instead, Adam opens a bakery, hires staff, and builds a thriving business around his strengths.
From the outside, it’s obvious he made the right choice. Yet leaders often face the same misguided advice: spend most of your time fixing weaknesses so you can be “well-rounded.”
In reality, acknowledging weaknesses and doubling down on strengths leads to far better results.